Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 23
August 23
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Spiralhastings.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No authorship or publication information. Kelly hi! 00:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:23skidoo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be identical to [1] with no indication of CC license; front page of said side indicates copyright. Kinu t/c 02:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:3.liga080531b.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged with a free license, but uploader added several non-free logos in their work. — ξxplicit 03:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CrashMusicLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- unfree logo of an organization which is not the subject of a wikipedia article. Not useful to any other article. - Metal lunchbox (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Beynon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphaned logo, presumably non-free. The uploader claims to have permission, but it looks like Wikipedia-only permission, which we don't accept. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Drilnoth. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:45, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural keep. File is not tagged as non-free, so it can't be deleted in this venue. Tagged for lacking fair use rationale. — ξxplicit 06:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Screenshot of presumably copyrighted software. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is in fact non-free, and fails NFCC #8 by a mile. The gameplay image (also here at PUF might make the cut, but not this. Should we transfer this to FfD? Sven Manguard Wha? 02:48, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural keep. File is not tagged as non-free, so it can't be deleted in this venue. Tagged for lacking fair use rationale. — ξxplicit 06:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Screenshot of presumably non-free software. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is in fact non-free, and fails NFCC #8 by a mile. The gameplay image (also here at PUF might make the cut, but not this. Should we transfer this to FfD? Sven Manguard Wha? 02:49, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural keep. File is not tagged as non-free, so it can't be deleted in this venue. Tagged for lacking fair use rationale. — ξxplicit 06:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Screenshot of presumably non-free software. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ken Demarest.face.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Likely copyrighted by author. Claim of fair use but not used in any article, and could be replaced by a free image if needed. Kinu t/c 16:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JamesGrahamFenner.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The image is taken from a television show: Bad Girls (TV series). It's a really hastily photoshopped cut-out from some promotional material. If someone who cares about the source article (Jim Fenner) wants to upload an image with a fair-use rationale, that's fine, but there's no benefit in keeping this very low-quality copyvio around. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Skye bennett june11.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claim that the author is Lisa Bennett not compatible with uploader being the copyright holder. Eeekster (talk) 20:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.